<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.0//EN" "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query/static/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName/>
			<JournalTitle>IJOTM</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>2008-6490</Issn>
			<Volume>6</Volume>
			<Issue>4</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
				<Year>2015</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>17</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<ArticleTitle>Competitive Market Analysis of Transplant Centers and Discrepancy of Wait-Listing of Recipients for Kidney Transplantation</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>141</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>149</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>PS</FirstName>
				<LastName>Cho</LastName>
				<Affiliation>Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. info@ijotm.com</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>RF</FirstName>
				<LastName>Saidi</LastName>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>CJ</FirstName>
				<LastName>Cutie</LastName>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>DSC</FirstName>
				<LastName>Ko</LastName>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<History>
			<PubDate PubStatus="received">
				<Year>2015</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>17</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</History>
		<Abstract>Background: There are over 250 kidney transplant programs in the USA.Objective: To determine if highly competitive regions, defined as regions with a higher number of transplant centers, will approve and wait-list more end-stage renal disease (ESRD) candidates for transplant despite consistent incidence and prevalence of ESRD nationwide.Methods: ESRD Network and OPTN data completed in 2011 were obtained from all transplant centers including listing data, market saturation, market share, organs transplanted, and ESRD prevalence. Herfindahl- Hirschman Index (HHI) was used to measure the size of firms in relation to the industry to determine the amount of competition.Results: States were separated into 3 groups (HHI&amp;lt;1000 considered competitive; HHI 1000&amp;ndash;1800 considered moderate competition; and HHI&amp;gt;1800 considered highly concentrated). The percentage of ESRD patients listed in competitive, moderate, and highly concentrated regions were 19.73%, 17.02%, and 13.75%, respectively. The ESRD listing difference between competitive versus highly concentrated was significant (p&amp;lt;0.05).Conclusion: When there is strong competition without a dominant center as defined by the HHI, the entire state tends to list more patients for transplant to drive up their own center&amp;rsquo;s market share. Our analysis of the available national data suggests a discrepancy in access for ESRD patient to transplantation due to transplant center competition.</Abstract>
	</Article>
</ArticleSet>
